_note: Representative sample oversight ledger from IRP Compliance. Each line is one append-only human-control event captured by IRP (Intent Record Protocol). Records illustrate the structure of documented human oversight under EU AI Act Art. 14. This is a sanitised sample, not production customer data. Inspect the open protocol at https://github.com/S0tman/irp-capture


source: classification

human_action: classified

human_decision: IRP Compliance's own AI features classified as limited-risk, not Annex III high-risk

confirmed_by: Johan Lopes Helgesson

rationale: Features assist compliance preparation and make no automated decisions about individuals; no Annex III category applies. No FRIA is required for our own deployer use under Art. 27.


source: assessment

ai_proposed: EU AI Act readiness score 47%, maturity 3/5

human_action: confirmed

human_decision: Score recorded as assessed

rationale: Reviewed scoring inputs against the questionnaire responses; no discrepancy found.


source: remediation

ai_proposed: Remediation owner for Art. 12 gap: 'IT-ansvarig'

human_decision: Owner changed to named DPO; deadline brought forward to 2027-09-01

rationale: AI assigned a generic role; a named accountable person is required for the evidence record.


source: fria

ai_proposed: FRIA section 3 draft: data retention risk classified as LOW

human_decision: Retention risk raised to MEDIUM

rationale: Draft understated the 30-day retention exposure; corrected before the record was written. AI output was not accepted as-is.


source: scan

ai_proposed: Company scan risk level: HIGH

human_action: rejected

human_decision: Not recorded; risk level reassessed as MEDIUM on review

rationale: AI over-weighted a single Annex III keyword; manual review found the use case did not meet the high-risk threshold.


ai_proposed: Support chat answer asserting a specific fine figure for a customer scenario

human_action: declined

human_decision: Answer not recorded as guidance; flagged as requiring legal review

rationale: AI produced a specific legal conclusion; this is outside the tool's intended-purpose scope and must not become a record.


ai_proposed: FRIA section 5 draft: stakeholder groups and mitigation measures

human_decision: Accepted as drafted after review

rationale: Reviewed against the assessment data; stakeholder mapping and mitigations were accurate and complete.